4.7 Article

A study of acidity on PM2.5 in Hong Kong using online ionic chemical composition measurements

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 45, 期 39, 页码 7081-7088

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.040

关键词

Particle acidity; Ionic chemical composition; Acid-catalyzed reactions; PILS-IC

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [615406]
  2. Hong Kong University Grant Council [SEG HKUST07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle in-situ pH (pH(IS)), defined as pH of the aqueous phase on aerosols, is an important factor in influencing aerosol-phase chemistry and uptake of gaseous species by particles. In this study, a continuous system, Particle-into-Liquid System (PILS) coupled with two ion chromatographs, was used to obtain PM2.5 ionic chemical composition at a time resolution of 30 min at a suburban site in Hong Kong under three different synoptic conditions. The chemical composition data and meteorological parameters (e.g., temperature, relative humidity (RH)) are input into Aerosol Inorganic Model (AIM-III) for estimation of in-situ pH through calculation of H+ amount and aerosol liquid water content (LWC). The particle pH(IS) ranged from -1.87 to 3.12, with an average at -0.03, indicating the PM2.5 particles in Hong Kong are highly acidic. Unlike particle strong acidity, which was dominated by sulfate concentration, the amount of aerosol liquid water content could significantly influence in-situ particle acidity. Principal factor analysis has identified the equivalent concentration ratio between cations and anions (i.e., R+/-) and RH to be the two most important factors influencing the particle pH(IS). pH(IS) under different synoptic conditions in this study could be well approximated by a single linear regression equation (slope: 0.95, R-2: 0.93), i.e., pH(IS) = 4.94 R+/- + 3.11 RH - 5.70. Such an empirical equation provides a convenient mean in estimating particle in-situ acidity for assessing the role of acid-catalyzed aerosol reactions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据