4.7 Article

Trends, temporal and spatial characteristics, and uncertainties in biomass burning emissions in the Pearl River Delta, China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 45, 期 24, 页码 4051-4059

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.016

关键词

Pearl River Delta region; Biomass burning emission inventory; Temporal characteristics; Spatial characteristics; Uncertainty

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [40875061]
  2. NSFC-GD Joint Foundation [U1033001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-year inventories of biomass burning emissions were established in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region for the period 2003-2007 based on the collected activity data and emission factors. The results indicated that emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), organic carbon (OC), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC), carbon monoxide (CO), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) presented clear declining trends. Domestic biofuel burning was the major contributor, accounting for more than 60% of the total emissions. The preliminary temporal profiles were established with MODIS fire count information, showing that higher emissions were observed in winter (from November to March) than other seasons. The emissions were spatially allocated into grid cells with a resolution of 3 km x 3 km, using GIS-based land use data as spatial surrogates. Large amount of emissions were observed mostly in the less developed areas in the PRD region. The uncertainties in biomass burning emission estimates were quantified using Monte Carlo simulation: the results showed that there were higher uncertainties in organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) emission estimates, ranging from -71% to 133% and -70% to 128%, and relatively lower uncertainties in SO2, NOx and CO emission estimates. The key uncertainty sources of the developed inventory included emission factors and parameters used for estimating biomass burning amounts. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据