4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Temporal and spatial coding of periodicity information in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger)

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 168, 期 1-2, 页码 110-130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00367-2

关键词

inferior colliculus; amplitude modulation; latency; envelope periodicity; temporal processing; neuronal map; pitch perception

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amplitude modulation responses and onset latencies of multi-unit recordings and evoked potentials were investigated in the central nucleus of inferior colliculus (ICC) in the awake chinchilla. Nine hundred and one recording sites with best frequencies between 60 and 30 kHz showed either phasic (18%), tonic (25%), or phasic-tonic (57%) responses. Of 554 sites tested for responses to modulation frequencies 73% were responsive and 57% showed clear preference for a narrow range of modulation frequencies. Well defined bandpass characteristics were found for 32% of rate modulation transfer functions (rate-MTFs) and 36% of synchronization MTFs (sync-MTFs). The highest best modulation frequency (BMF) of a bandpass rate-MTF was 600 Hz. Neurons with phasic responses to best-frequency tones showed strong phase coupling to modulation frequencies and were dominated by bandpass rate-MTFs and sync-MTFs. Most neurons with tonic responses showed bandpass tuning only for sync-MTFs. Both BMFs and onset latencies changed systematically across frequency-band laminae of the ICC. Low BMFs and long latencies were located medially and high BMFs and short latencies laterally. Latency distributions obtained with evoked potentials to clicks showed a similar gradient to the multi-unit data. These findings are in line with previous findings in different animals including humans and support the hypothesis that temporal processing results in a topographic arrangement orthogonal to the spectral processing axis, thus forming a second neural axis of the auditory system. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据