4.7 Article

Connexin 43 enhances the adhesivity and mediates the invasion of malignant glioma cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 4302-4311

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-11-04302.2002

关键词

cell motility; astrocyte; gap junction; bystander death; brain tumor; rat

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01NS30007, R01 NS030007, R01NS33106, R01NS38073, R01 NS029813, R01 NS038073, R01NS29813, R01 NS033106] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hallmark of astrocytic tumors is their infiltrative nature. Although their aggressive and typically widespread dispersal in the adult brain differs fundamentally from that of other brain tumors, little is known about their cellular basis. Astrocytic tumors express the gap junction protein connexin 43 (Cx43), and we show here that Cx43 expression induced the morphological transformation of glioma cells into an epithelial phenotype. In a short-term aggregation assay, Cx43 expression was associated with a several-fold increase in the competence of glioma cells to aggregate. Antibodies directed against the extracellular domain of Cx43 restored the connexin-deficient phenotype, as manifested by a dose-dependent reduction in aggregation. Apart from their role in gap junction formation, connexins may therefore be considered a distinct class of membrane proteins with adhesive properties. Moreover, implanted Cx43-expressing glioma cells established functional gap junction channels with host astrocytes and dispersed through a substantially greater volume of brain parenchyma than mock- and mutant Cx43-transfected sister cells. Cx43 expression therefore may modulate not only the adhesion of astrocytes to one another, but the spread of glial tumor cells throughout astrocytic syncytia. These observations widen our concept of the potential interactions between tumor cells and their surroundings and suggest that both connexin proteins and their derived gap junctions are critical determinants of the invasiveness of central gliomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据