4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of an alanyl-glutamine-based oral rehydration and nutrition therapy solution on electrolyte and water absorption in a rat model of secretory diarrhea induced by cholera toxin

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 458-462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00775-X

关键词

alanyl-glutamine; diarrhea and malnutrition; oral rehydration and nutrition therapy; secretory diarrhea

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P010 AI 26512, 2P50 AI 30639-06] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Recurring diarrhea and persistent diarrhea are commonly associated with malnutrition and long-term functional deficits. A beneficial approach would be to develop an alanyl-glutamine (AlaGIn)based oral rehydration and nutrition therapy (ORNT). We investigated the effect of an AlaGln-ORNT solution on electrolyte and water absorption in a rat model of secretory diarrhea induced by cholera toxin, METHODS: Phenol sulfonphthalein (50 mug/mL) was used as a non-absorbable marker for calculation of net water and electrolyte transport. Solutions tested were Ringer's solution, a glutamine-based ORNT (Gln-ORNT) solution, and an AlaGln-ORNT solution. Cholera toxin (1 mug/mL) was injected into lumen of rat small intestinal segments and incubated for 18 h before the initiation of the perfusion. RESULTS: Cholera toxin induced significant secretion of electrolyte and water in the control Ringer's solution. AlaGln-ORNT and Gln-ORNT solutions reduced the sodium secretory effect of cholera toxin by 128% and 36%, respectively. The net water secretion also was reduced by 95% and 60%, respectively, with the AlaGln-ORNT and Gln-ORTN solutions. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that AlaGln-ORNT solution can enhance water and electrolyte intestinal absorption even better than glutamine or glucose and thus provide a potential novel approach for ORNT to break the vicious cycle of diarrhea and malnutrition. Clinical trials are now needed in children and adults with diarrhea and malnutrition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据