4.3 Article

Evidence for shear-induced increase in membrane fluidity in the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-002-0315-9

关键词

shear stress; bioluminescence; membrane fluidity; molecular rotors; fluorescence

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-40696] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [1F32GM20476] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluid shear stress has been demonstrated to affect the structure and function of various cell types. In mammalian cells, it was hypothesized that shear-induced membrane fluidization leads to activation of heterotrimetric G-proteins. The purpose of this study was to determine if a similar mechanism exists in the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum, a single-celled eukaryotic aquatic organism that bioluminesces under shear stress. Membrane fluidity changes in L. polyedrum were monitored using the molecular rotor 9-(dicyanovinyl)-julolidine, whose fluorescence intensity changes inversely with membrane fluidity. Dual-staining with 9-(dicyanovinyl)julolidine and the membrane dye 1-(4-trimethylammoniumphenyl)-6-phenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene p-toluenesulfonate indicates membrane localization. Subjecting L. polyedrum cells to increasing shear stress reversibly decreased 9-(dicyanovinyl)-julolidine fluorescence, while autofluorescence of the cytoplasmic chlorophyll did not change. The relationship between shear stress (0.63 Pa, 1.25 Pa, 1.88 Pa, and 2.5 Pa) and membrane fluidity changes was linear and dose-dependent with a 12% increase in fluidity at 2.5 Pa. To further explore this mechanism a membrane fluidizing agent, dimethyl sulfoxide was added. Dimethyl sulfoxide decreased 9-(dicyanovinyl)-julolidine emission by 41 +/- 15% and elicited a dose-dependent bioluminescent response at concentrations of 0.2%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.25%. This study demonstrates a link between fluid shear stress and membrane fluidity, and suggests that the membrane is an important flow mechanosensor of dinoflagellates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据