Outcome after recannulation and a second course of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Background/Purpose: Controversy surrounds the justification of a second course of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for patients that deteriorate after initial decannulation. The authors' experience with a small number of patients requiring recannulation led them to investigate the results of a second ECMO course from all institutions that report to the ELSO registry. Methods: The ELSO neonatal registry for patients that underwent multiple ECMO courses was reviewed and mortality and complication rates between first and second courses were compared. Complications were classified according to the following ELSO registry defined categories: hemorrhagic, mechanical, metabolic, infectious, renal, pulmonary, neurologic, and cardiac, Results: Of the 16,460 patients in the ELSO neonatal registry in January 2000, 205 patients (1.25%) have required multiple ECMO courses. There have been 201 patients (1.22%) who have needed 2 courses of ECMO and 4 patients (0.024%) have undergone 3 ECMO runs. A total of 557 complications occurred during the first ECMO course in these 205 patients, and 672 complications developed during the second course. This represents an increase in the complication rate by 20.6% during the second ECMO course. Although mechanical complications were the most common, there was no change in the incidence between first and second courses. However, the frequency of complications increased in all other classifications during the second course when compared with the first. The largest increases occurred with neurologic and infectious complications (134% and 79% increases, respectively). Renal and metabolic complications also were markedly elevated (35% and 24%, respectively). Seventy-six of 201 (38%) patients who required 2 courses of ECMO and 1 of 4 patients undergoing 3 runs survived. Survival was more likely for patients with meconium aspiration, Primary pulmonary hypertension and total anomalous pulmonary venous return had low survival rates. Conclusions: A small subset of patients may require recannulation and a second ECMO course. Although survival may be achieved in more than one third of these patients, complication rates are increased during the second course. Specifically, neurologic, infectious, renal, and metabolic complication rates are increased. Long-term consequences of recannulation are unknown. Selection criteria identifying patients that may benefit from recannulation have not been established.