4.7 Article

Biogenic emission of dimethylsulfide (DMS) from the North Yellow Sea, China and its contribution to sulfate in aerosol during summer

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 43, 期 13, 页码 2196-2203

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.011

关键词

Dimethylsulfide; Methanesulfonic acid; Non-sea-salt sulfate; Sea-to-air flux; North Yellow Sea

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40476034, 40525017, 40490265]
  2. Science and Technology Key Project of Shandong Province [2006GG2205024]
  3. Taishan Mountain Scholar Construction Engineering Special Fund of Shandong Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seawater, atmospheric dimethylsulfide (DMS) and aerosol compounds, potentially linked with DMS oxidation, such as methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and non-sea-salt sulfate (nss-SO(4)(2-)) were determined in the North Yellow Sea, China during July-August, 2006. The concentrations of seawater and atmospheric DMS ranged from 2.01 to 11.79 nmol l(-1) and from 1.68 to 8.26 nmol m(-3), with average values of 6.20 nmol l(-1) and 5.01 nmol m(-3), respectively. Owing to the appreciable concentration gradient, DMS accumulated in the surface water was transferred into the atmosphere, leading to a net sea-to-air flux of 6.87 mu mol m(-2) d(-1) during summer. In the surface seawater, high DMS values corresponded well with the concurrent increases in chlorophyll a levels and a significant correlation was observed between integrated DMS and chlorophyll a concentrations. In addition, the concentrations of MSA and nSS-SO(4)(2-) measured in the aerosol samples ranged from 0.012 to 0.079 mu g m(-3) and from 3.82 to 11.72 mu g m(-3), with average values of 0.039 and 7.40 mu g m(-3), respectively. Based on the observed MSA, nss-SO(4)(2-) and their ratio, the relative biogenic sulfur contribution was estimated to range from 1.2% to 11.5%, implying the major contribution of anthropogenic source to sulfur budget in the study area. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据