4.7 Article

Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 220-232

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.049

关键词

motor vehicles; tunnel study; aerosol optical properties; nitrogen oxides; exhaust particulate matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gas- and particle-phase pollutants were measured separately for (a) light-duty (LD) vehicles and (b) medium-duty (MD) and heavy-duty (HD) diesel trucks. Measurements were made during summer 2006 at the Caldecott Tunnel in the San Francisco Bay area as part of a continuing campaign to track changes in vehicle emissions over time. When normalized to fuel consumption, NOx emission factors were found to be 3.0 +/- 0.2 and 40 +/- 3 g kg(-1) for LD vehicles and MD/HD diesel trucks, respectively. Corresponding particulate matter (PM2.5) emission factors were 0.07 +/- 0.02 and 1.4 +/- 0.3 g kg(-1). The ratio of particulate black carbon to organic mass (BC/OM) for LD vehicles was 0.71 +/- 0.15. For diesel trucks, BC/OM was 2 +/- 1, indicating that PM2.5 was dominated by BC. Results from 2006 are compared to similar measurements made at the same site in 1997. For LD vehicles, NOx and PM2.5 emission factors decreased by 67 +/- 3 % and 36 +/- 17%, respectively. Corresponding decreases for diesel trucks were 30 +/- 9% for NOx and 48 +/- 12% for PM2.5. The ratio of HD to LD emission factor for NOx increased from 6 +/- 1 to 13 +/- 1 between 1997 and 2006, which indicates an increase in the relative importance of diesel trucks as a source of NOx emissions. The absorption, scattering, and extinction cross-section emission factors parameters relevant to climate change and atmospheric visibility, were an order of magnitude higher for diesel trucks than LD vehicles. Single-scattering albedo, measured at lambda = 675 nm, was 0.31 +/- 0.06 and 0.20 +/- 0.05 for LD vehicle and diesel truck PM emissions, respectively. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据