4.7 Article

The three-point function in large-scale structure -: I.: The weakly non-linear regime in N-body simulations

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05431.x

关键词

methods : N-body simulations; large-scale structure of Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a comparison of the predictions for the two- and three-point correlation functions of density fluctuations, xi and zeta, in gravitational perturbation theory (PT) against large cold dark matter (CDM) simulations. This comparison is made possible for the first time on large weakly non-linear scales (>10 h(-1) Mpc) thanks to the development of a new algorithm for estimating correlation functions for millions of points in only a few minutes. Previous studies in the literature comparing the PT predictions of the three-point statistics with simulations have focused mostly on Fourier space, angular space or smoothed fields. Results in configuration space, such as those presented here, were limited to small scales where leading-order PT gives a poor approximation. Here we also propose and apply a method for separating the first-order and subsequent contributions to PT by combining different output times from the evolved simulations. We find that in all cases there is a regime where simulations do reproduce the leading-order (tree-level) predictions of PT for the reduced three-point function Q(3) similar tozeta/xi(2). For steeply decreasing correlations (such as the standard CDM model) deviations from the tree-level results are important even at relatively large scales, similar or equal to20 Mpc h (-1) . On larger scales xi goes to zero and the results are dominated by sampling errors. In more realistic models (such as the LambdaCDM cosmology) deviations from the leading-order PT become important at smaller scales r similar or equal to 10 Mpc h(-1), although this depends on the particular three-point configuration. We characterize the range of validity of this agreement and show the behaviour of the next-order (one-loop) corrections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据