4.7 Article

Generation of symptomatic palatal tremor is not correlated with inferior olivary hypertrophy

期刊

BRAIN
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 1348-1357

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf126

关键词

involuntary movement; palatal tremor; olivary hypertrophy; immunohistochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the generation of symptomatic palatal tremor (SPT) is thought to derive from the abnormal activity of hypertrophic inferior olivary neurones, the actual mechanism of SPT has not yet been elucidated. We therefore investigated the relationship between SPT and the pathological process of inferior olivary hypertrophy (IOH). We examined 16 autopsied subjects with cerebrovascular lesions of the dentate-olivary tracts. We analysed the size of the olives, the number of olivary neurones, synaptic, axonal and astrocytic changes in the olives and the clinical course in the subjects. SPT was observed in eight patients, in seven of whom it appeared 1-2 months after interruption of the afferents then progressed to reach a peak similar to1-2 years from the onset. SPT persisted for the rest of the subjects' lives without decreasing in severity. Neuronal hypertrophic change began 20-30 days after the onset of the causative lesions and reached maximum size, accompanied by prominent astrocytosis and synaptic and axonal remodelling, 6-7 months later. The number of olivary neurones decreased to <10% of that in controls in patients who survived >6 years. Despite the persistence of SPT, both the myelin and the axons of efferent fibres from olivary neurones were severely degenerated in patients who survived several years. Therefore, the appearance of SPT may depend on the hyperactivity of olivary neurones released from inhibitory inputs until the peak of both IOH and SPT. However, the persistence of peak intensity and distribution of established SPT is probably due to both the disturbance of natural rhythmicity in the body and the lack of feedback from the abnormal movement resulting from the dysfunction of the olive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据