4.7 Article

Source of nitrogen in wet deposition to a rice agroecosystem at Tai lake region

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 42, 期 21, 页码 5182-5192

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.008

关键词

nitrogen isotope; atmospheric wet deposition; rice agriculture; watershed ecosystem; eutrophication

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen (N) in wet deposition can provide significant nutrients to algae, which potentially contributes to eutrophication in waterbodies, and to nutrient surplus of rice-wheat crops in the Tai lake region, Jiangsu Province, China. Quantifying the N compounds in wet deposition and determining their sources is important to understand how to control eutrophication in lakes and to improve recommendations for fertilizer use. In this study, the concentrations of inorganic N, molar ratios of NH4+/NO3- and the natural N-15 abundance of NH4+ (delta(NH4+)-N-15) in wet deposition were determined for 78 precipitation events between June 2003 and July 2005. Samples were collected at two sites in Tai lake region, a watershed rice agroecosystem currently experiencing eutrophication. The average N wet deposition amounted to 27 kg N ha(-1)yr(-1), with 60% in the form of NH4+. Annually, two cycles of depleted and enriched delta(NH4+)-N-15 indicate the shifting of main source of NH3 volatilization between chemical fertilizer and excreta of local residents and domestic animals, surface waters, and other organic N. The peak in NH4+/NO3- ratio, coupled with depleted delta(NH4+)-N-15 in mid-June, coincided with the fice-transplanting period, which is indicative of surplus fertilizer application. Enriched delta(NH4+)-N-15 values in August-October and in April-May were indicative of enhanced emissions from excreta and polluted waterbodies in the warmer seasons. Findings suggest that delta(NH4+)-N-15 could be used to indicate the sources of NH3 volatilization, and the NH4+/NO3- ratio to indicate the intensity of wet N deposition. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据