4.4 Article

Combined effect of gamma irradiation, ascorbic acid, and edible coating on the improvement of microbial and biochemical characteristics of ground beef

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 981-987

出版社

INT ASSOC FOOD PROTECTION
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-65.6.981

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was conducted to evaluate the combined effect of gamma irradiation and the incorporation of natural antimicrobial compounds in cross-linked films on the microbiological and biochemical characteristics of ground beef. Medium-fat (23% fat) ground beef patties were divided into three separate treatment groups: (i) control samples without additives, (ii) ground beef samples containing 0.5% (wt/wt) ascorbic acid, and (iii) ground beef samples containing 0.5% ascorbic acid and coated with a protein-based cross-linked film containing immobilized spice powders. Meat samples were irradiated at doses of 0, 1, 2, and 3 kGy and stored at 4 +/- 2degreesC. Microbial growth (based on total aerobic plate counts [APCs] and total coliforms) was evaluated, as were the content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and that of free sulfydryl groups. At the end of the storage period, Enterobacteriaceae, presumptive Staphylococcus aureus, presumptive Pseudomonas spp., Brochothrix thermosphacta, and lactic acid bacteria were enumerated. Regardless of the treatment group, irradiation significantly (P less than or equal to 0.05) reduced the APCs. Irradiation doses of 1, 2, and 3 kGy produced immediate APC reductions of 2, 3, and 4 log units, respectively. An APC level of 6 log CFU/g was reached after 4, 7, and 10 days for samples irradiated at 1, 2, and 3 kGy, respectively. Lactic acid bacteria and B. thermosphacta were more resistant to irradiation than were Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas, The TBARS and free sulfydryl contents were stabilized during postirradiation storage for samples containing ascorbic acid and coated with the protein-based cross-linked film containing immobilized spice powders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据