4.7 Article

Structure-property relationships in cross-linked polyester-clay nanocomposites

期刊

POLYMER
卷 43, 期 13, 页码 3699-3705

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00187-8

关键词

polyester-clay nanocomposites; X-ray diffraction; structure-property relationships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crosslinked polyester-clay nanocomposites were prepared by dispersing organically modified montmorillonite in prepromoted polyester resin and subsequently crosslinked using methyl ethyl ketone peroxide catalyst at several different clay concentrations (1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 wt%). X-ray diffraction studies revealed the formation of a nanocomposite in all cases with the disappearance of the peak corresponding to the basal spacing of the pure clay. Transmission electron microscopy was used to study the morphology at different length scales and showed the nanocomposite to be comprised of a random dispersion of intercalated/exfoliated aggregates throughout the matrix. Thermal degradation of the nanocomposites was found to be slightly but progressively hastened compared to the pure crosslinked polymer, loss and storage modulus were monotonically shifted toward higher frequency values, and the tensile modulus was found to decrease with increasing clay content. These unexpected results were rationalized based on the decrease in the degree of crosslinking of the polyester resin in the nanocomposite, in the presence of clay. In particular, the nanocomposite containing 2.5 wt% clay consistently demonstrated a drop in properties far greater than that observed at other clay concentrations, and was attributed to the greater degree of exfoliation seen in this case which presumably leads to a greater decrease in the degree of crosslinking. Oxygen permeability rates in the polyester nanocomposites decreased with increasing clay content, as expected, and was satisfactorily reproduced using a tortuosity based model. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据