4.7 Article

Cerebrovascular disease and evolution of depressive symptoms in the cardiovascular health study

期刊

STROKE
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1636-1644

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000018405.59799.D5

关键词

cerebrovascular disorders; depression; epidemiology; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [K07 MH01367, P50 MH60451] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Previous studies have reported an association between cerebrovascular disease and depressive symptoms. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) provides an opportunity to examine the relationship between vascular brain pathology seen on neuroimaging and changes in depressive symptoms. Methods-The sample included 3236 CHS participants who had an MRI brain scan. Demographic variables, medical history, functional status, and apolipoprotein E genotype were obtained at baseline. Annual scores on a modified version of the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale were obtained initially and LIP to 7 years subsequently. Results-After controlling for important covariates, occurrence of depressive symptoms (defined as modified CES-D score of >7) was associated with small lesions in the basal ganglia, large cortical white-matter lesions, and severe subcortical white-matter grade. Neuroiniaging variables did not predict incident depression among those who were nondepressive at the time of MRI. Persistence of depressive symptoms across 2 consecutive time points was associated with small basal ganglia lesions and large cerebral cortical white-matter lesions. Worsening of depression (increase in CES-D score of 5) was associated with subcortical white-matter lesions. Conclusions-These findings suggest that cerebrovascular disease at baseline is related to depression symptoms over time. Further studies are needed to investigate the differential effects of subcortical white- versus gray-matter lesions on mood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据