4.6 Article

Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis is inhibited in transgenic mice expressing human C-reactive protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 168, 期 11, 页码 5792-5797

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.11.5792

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI42183] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS29719] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We show here using a transgenic model that human C-reactive protein (CRP) protects against experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57BL/6 mice. In transgenic compared with wild-type females, the duration of the human CRP acute phase response that accompanies the inductive phase of active EAE correlates with a delay in disease onset. In transgenic males, which have higher human CRP expression than females do, EAE is delayed, and its severity is reduced relative to same-sex controls. Furthermore, in male transgenics, there is little or no infiltration of the spinal cord by CD3(+) T cells and CD11b(+) monocytes and macrophages, and EAE is sometimes prevented altogether. CRP transgenics also resist EAE induced passively by transfer of encephalitogenic T cells from wild-type donors. Human CRP has three effects on cultured encephalitogenic cells that could contribute to the protective effect observed in vivo: 1) CRP inhibits encephalitogenic peptide-induced proliferation of T cells; 2) CRP inhibits production of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma) and chemokines (macrophage-inflammatory protein-la, RANTES, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1); and 3) CRP increases IL-10 production. All three of these actions are realized in vitro only in the presence of high concentrations of human CRP. The combined data suggest that during the acute phase of inflammation accompanying EAE, the high level of circulating human CRP that is achieved in CRP-transgenic mice inhibits the damaging action of inflammatory cells and/or T cells that otherwise support onset and development of EAE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据