4.6 Article

Comparative developmental anatomy of seedlings in nine species of Podostemaceae (subfamily Podostemoideae)

期刊

ANNALS OF BOTANY
卷 89, 期 6, 页码 755-765

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf109

关键词

adventitious root; developmental anatomy; evolution; hypocotyl; Podostemaceae; primary root (radicle); root cap; seedling; shoot apex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The developmental anatomy is described for seedlings of nine Asian and Australian species of Podostemaceae, subfamily Podostemoideae. The hypocotyl is rudimentary (except in Zeylanidium olivaceum) and does not form a primary root in any of the species examined. An adventitious root forms endogenously in the hypocotyl of six species with ribbon-like or flattened subcylindrical roots, and in Z. olivaceum with foliose roots. In contrast, it forms exogenously in Hydrobryum griffithii and Synstylis micranthera with foliose roots. The juvenile root becomes flattened and dorsiventral, branches exogenously (in Polypleurum stylosum, P. wallichii and Z. lichenoides) and produces shoots endogenously (in P. stylosum, P. wallichii, S. micranthera and Z. lichenoides). The root meristem is simple, composed of surface and uniform inner cells, and is devoid of root cap initials in all species. The reduced meristem morphology of seedling roots may be primitive in the Asian-Australian Podostemoideae. A root cap or protective tissue did not form during the culture period, even in the seven species with capped adult roots, probably due to its delayed development. It was absent throughout ontogeny in the other two species. No obvious shoot apical meristem forms between the cotyledons. One to several leaves occupy the shoot apical area in species with endogenous adventitious roots, while no leaves are formed in species with exogenous roots. These differences suggest recurrent origins of foliose roots in the Asian clade. Similarities between the unique seedling morphology and mutant Arabidopsis phenotypes are discussed. (C) 2002 Annals of Botany Company.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据