4.5 Article

Tissue-specific induction of herbivore resistance: seaweed response to amphipod grazing

期刊

OECOLOGIA
卷 132, 期 1, 页码 68-76

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0944-2

关键词

algae; chemical defense; induced defense; Sargassum filipendula; within-plant variation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissues within individual plants can vary greatly in the strength of their constitutive (i.e., permanent) and induced resistance to herbivores. Optimal defense theory predicts that defenses should be allocated among tissues in proportion to the value of the tissues to the plant and the tissue-specific risk of attack by grazers. We examined the relationship between tissue value and defense in the highly-differentiated brown seaweed Sargassum filipendula. Tissues within S. filipendula varied widely in palatability to the herbivorous amphipod Ampithoe longimana, with younger tissues preferred over older tissues and blades preferred over stipes. Old stipes (at the base of the plant), which linked the other tissues to the seafloor and were thus the most valuable tissue to the plant, were defended constitutively and resisted amphipod grazing by virtue of their toughness rather than via deterrent chemistry. Induction of resistance as a result of amphipod grazing occurred only in the top stipes, which contain the meristematic tissue responsible for future growth. Induction in the top stipes was not due to toughness or other structural properties, as the unpalatability persisted when top stipes were dried, ground to a fine powder, and reconstituted into an agar matrix. This suggests that the induced resistance to grazing resulted from an increase in chemical defenses. The demonstration of constitutive or induced defenses in only the more valuable tissues of the seaweed is consistent with predictions of optimal defense theory. Our finding of induction due to mesograzer (amphipod) feeding is also consistent with the notion that it is these small, more sedentary, herbivores that are most likely to induce defenses in seaweeds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据