4.7 Article

Object recognition memory and cholinergic parameters in mice expressing human presenilin 1 transgenes

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 175, 期 2, 页码 398-406

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7915

关键词

acetylcholine; Alzheimer disease; choline acetyltransferase; memory; muscarinic receptors; nicotinic receptor; object recognition; presenilin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most autosomal dominant forms of Alzheimer disease (AD) are related to missense mutations in the human presenilin (PS) 1 gene. Although the underlying mechanisms associated with pathophysiology of AD have yet to be clearly established, pathogenic mutations in the PS1 gene influence the processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein, leading to increased production and deposition of highly fibrillogenic amyloid beta(1-42) peptide in the brains of AD patients. As cognitive dysfunction in AD is associated with a dramatic loss of cholinergic innervation particularly in the hippocampus and neocortex, we investigated learning and cholinergic neurochemistry in transgenic mice expressing pathogenic mutant L286V or wild-type (wt) human PS1 transgenes. relative to wt, the L286V PS1 transgenic mice exhibited reduced sensori-motor activity and marked deterioration of object memory between 3 and 5 h after the first encounter. activity of the biosynthetic enzyme choline acetyltransferase was not altered in the hippocampus, frontoparietal cortex, or striatum of mutant transgenic mice relative to wt transgenic or littermate nontransgenic controls. No differences in the densities of M1/[H-3]pirenzepine, M2/[H-3]AF-DX 384, or alpha(7) nicotinic/I-125-alpha-bungarotoxin receptor binding sites were evident in any brain regions among L286V PS1 transgenic, wt PS1 transgenic, and littermate nontransgenic controls. these results suggest that overexpression of a mutated PS1 gene induces a subtle alteration in object memory without affecting cholinergic neurochemistry. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据