4.5 Article

Gene therapy for prostate cancer delivered by ovine adenovirus and mediated by purine nucleoside phosphorylase and fludarabine in mouse models

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 759-768

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301698

关键词

gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy; RM1 cell line; ovine adenovirus; PC3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A gene-directed enzyme pro-drug therapy (GDEPT) based on purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), that converts the prodrug, fludarabine to 2-fluoroadenine, has been described, but studies are limited compared with other GDEPTs. We investigated the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of PNP-GDEPT for treating androgen-independent (AI) prostate cancer. The PNP gene controlled by Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) constitutive promoter was delivered using a recombinant ovine adenovirus vector (OAdV220) that uses a different receptor from human adenovirus type 5. In vitro, OAdV220 provided increased transgene expression over a comparable human Ad5 vector in infected AI, murine RM1 prostate cancer cells. Subsequent in vivo testing was therefore confined to OAdV220. Transduction of RM1 cells with OAdV220 before implantation in immunocompetent mice dramatically inhibited subcutaneous (s.c.) tumor growth when fludarabine phosphate was administered systemically and increased mouse survival in a dose-dependent manner. In tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice, a single intratumoral injection of OAdV220 produced detectable PNP activity for at least 6 days and with prodrug, retarded the growth of aggressive RM1 s.c. tumors by 35% at day 14. There was a consistent trend to reduction of pre-established intraprostatic RM1 tumors. A similar regimen induced significant therapeutic efficacy in human PC3 xenografts. Thus, ovine adenovirus-mediated GDEPT using the PNP system was effective in vivo against At prostate cancers, the aggressive murine RM1, and the human PC3 lines. Methods that improve viral dissemination and stimulate the immune system in vivo may further improve efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据