4.5 Article

Colonization of winter oilseed rape tissues by A/Tox+ and B/Tox0 Leptosphaeria maculans (phoma stem canker) in France and England

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 51, 期 3, 页码 311-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00689.x

关键词

blackleg; ISSR; ITS; Phoma lingam; rapeseed; systemic growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The colonization of winter oilseed rape plants and epidemiology of phoma stem canker differed between A/Tox(+) and B /Tox(0) Leptosphaeria maculans. In France and England, where plant colonization was investigated during two and three growing seasons, respectively, there was a difference in timing of leaf infection; A/Tox(+) L. maculans was predominant on leaves in the autumn (October/ November) but there was an increase in the incidence of B/Tox(0) in the winter (January/ February). In May, June and July both species could be isolated from all external parts of the plant (root to the upper stem) and all crown (stem base) tissues, although they differed in their distribution. At the root and crown, A/Tox(+) L. maculans was predominant and was located throughout the cortex, wood and pith tissues, but the rarer B/Tox(0) was located mainly in the cortex. Approximately equal numbers of A/Tox(+) and B/Tox(0) isolates were obtained from the upper stem - there was a greater proportion of B/Tox(0) isolates than at the crown. In England, after harvest in 1999 and 2000, pseudothecia on the lignified tap root and crown tissues produced predominantly A/Tox(+) ascospores (94%), while pseudothecia higher up the stem produced more B/Tox(0) ascospores (60%) than A/Tox(+) ascospores (40%). The timing of the onset of leaf spotting, earlier in the season for A/Tox(+) than B/Tox(0) L. maculans, and the predominance of mycelium of A/Tox(+) at the crown are consistent with the assumption that A/Tox(+) is more likely to cause the most damaging stem cankers than B/Tox(0) L. maculans. Identification as A/Tox(+) or B/Tox(0) by cultural characteristics differed only slightly (2.3%) from identification by molecular techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据