4.6 Article

Characterization of 3D elastic porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cell scaffolds fabricated by VARTM and particle leaching

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 133, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.42909

关键词

biomedical applications; manufacturing; porous materials; structure-property relations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303027, 11572290]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560525]
  3. University Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian [JK2014030]
  4. Fujian Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship [201410388065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, elastic porous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) cell scaffolds were fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM) and particle leaching technologies. To control the porous morphology and porosity, different processing parameters, such as compression load, compression time, and NaCl particle size for preparing NaCl preform, were studied. The porous structures of PDMS cell scaffolds were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The properties of PDMS cell scaffolds, including porosity, water absorption, interconnectivity, compression modulus, and compression strength were also investigated. The results showed that after the porogen-NaCl particles had been leached, the remaining pores had the sizes of 150-300, 300-450, and 450-600 mu m, which matched the sizes of the NaCl particles. The interconnectivity of PDMS cell scaffolds increases with an increase in the size of NaCl particles. It was also found that the smaller the size of the NaCl particles, the higher the porosity and water absorption of PDMS cell scaffolds. The content of residual NaCl in PDMS/NaCl scaffolds reduces under ultrasonic treatment. In addition, PDMS scaffolds with a pore size of 300-450 mu m have better mechanical properties compared to those with pore sizes of 150-300 and 450-600 mu m. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据