4.7 Article

The effects of heat treatment on the phase transformation behavior of plasma-sprayed stabilized ZrO2 coatings

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 155, 期 1, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01661-9

关键词

thermal barrier coating; stabilized zirconia; phase transformation; thermal cycle; oxygen vacancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partially stabilized zirconia (PSZ) is an attractive material for thermal barrier coatings. Zirconia exists in three crystallographic phases: cubic, tetragonal and monoclinic. In particular, the phase transformation of tetragonal to monoclinic is accompanied by significant volume expansion, so this transition generally results in cracking and contributes to the failure of the TBC system. Both plasma-sprayed ZrO2-8Y(2)O(3) (YSZ) and ZrO2-25CeO(2)-2.5Y(2)O(3), (CYSZ) coatings were isothermally heat-treated at 1300 and 1500 degreesC for 100 h and cooled at four different cooling rates. The monoclinic phase was not evident in all CYSZ samples annealed at 1300 and 1500 degreesC. In the 1500 degreesC heat-treated specimens, YSZ contains some monoclinic phase, while none exists in the 1300 degreesC heat-treated YSZ coating. The difference in phase transformation behavior between YSZ and CYSZ results from the degree of stabilization of the initial composition and the various cation radii. For YSZ, the different phase transformation behavior at the two temperatures is due to the stabilizing concentration of high-temperature phases and grain growth. For YSZ annealed at 1500 degreesC for 100 h, the amount of monoclinic phase increased with the slower cooling rate. High oxygen vacancy, formed during high-temperature holding, remained at room temperature due to a fast cooling rate. The extra oxygen vacancy at room temperature displaces an oxygen ion from the equilibrium position in the tetragonal phase and functions as a cubic stabilizer, so the tetragonal-monoclinic transformation is suppressed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据