4.7 Review

The placebo effect in alternative medicine: Can the performance of a healing ritual have clinical significance?

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 136, 期 11, 页码 817-825

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00011

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [1R01AT00402-01, 1R21AT00553] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [U24 AR43441] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In alternative medicine, the main question regarding placebo has been whether a given therapy has more than a placebo effect. Just as mainstream medicine ignores the clinical significance of its own placebo effect, the placebo effect of unconventional medicine is disregarded except for polemics. This essay looks at the placebo effect of alternative medicine as a distinct entity. This is done by reviewing current knowledge about the placebo effect and how it may pertain to alternative medicine. The term placebo effect is taken to mean not only the narrow effect of a dummy intervention but also the broad array of nonspecific effects in the patient-physician relationship, including attention; compassionate care; and the modulation of expectations, anxiety, and self-awareness. Five components of the placebo effect-patient, practitioner, patient-practitioner interaction, nature of the illness, and treatment and setting-are examined. Therapeutic patterns that heighten placebo effects are especially prominent in unconventional healing, and it seems possible that the unique drama of this realm may have enhanced placebo effects in particular conditions. Ultimately, only prospective trials directly comparing the placebo effects of unconventional and mainstream medicine can provide reliable evidence to support such claims. Nonetheless, the possibility of enhanced placebo effects raises complex conundrums. Can an alternative ritual with only nonspecific psychosocial effects have more positive health outcomes than a proven, specific conventional treatment? What makes therapy legitimate, positive clinical outcomes or culturally acceptable methods of attainment? Who decides?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据