4.7 Article

The far-ultraviolet spectrum of TW Hydrae.: I.: Observations of H2 fluorescence

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 572, 期 1, 页码 310-325

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/339731

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; circumstellar matter; line : identification; stars : individual (TW Hydrae); stars : pre main-sequence; ultraviolet : stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We observed the classical T Tauri star TW Hya with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on board the Hubble Space Telescope ( HST) using the E140M grating, from 1150 to 1700 A, with the E230M grating, from 2200 to 2900 Angstrom, and with the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer from 900 to 1180 Angstrom. Emission in 146 Lyman-band H-2 lines, representing 19 progressions, dominates the spectral region from 1250 to 1650 Angstrom. The total H-2 emission line flux is 1.94 x 10(12) ergs cm(-2) s(-1), which corresponds to 1.90 x 10(-4) L-. at TW Hya's distance of 56 pc. A broad stellar Lyalpha line photoexcites the H-2 from excited rovibrational levels of the ground electronic state to excited electronic states. The C II lambda1335 doublet, C III lambda1175 multiplet, and C IV 1550 doublet also electronically excite H-2. The velocity shift of the H-2 lines is consistent with the photospheric radial velocity of TW Hya, and the emission is not spatially extended beyond the 0.05 resolution of HST. The H-2 lines have an intrinsic FWHM of 11.91 +/- 0.16 km s(-1). One H-2 line is significantly weaker than predicted by this model because of C II wind absorption. We also do not observe any H-2 absorption against the stellar Lyalpha profile. From these results we conclude that the H-2 emission is more consistent with an origin in a disk rather than in an outflow or circumstellar shell. We also analyze the hot accretion region lines ( e. g., C IV Si IV O VI) of TW Hya, which are formed at the accretion shock, and discuss some reasons why Si lines appear significantly weaker than other TR region lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据