4.8 Article

Presenilin-1 mutations of leucine 166 equally affect the generation of the Notch and APP intracellular domains independent of their effect on Aβ42 production

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112686799

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG010133, P30 AG 10133] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 40039, R01 NS040039] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated presenilin (PS) proteins are required for the gamma-secretase cleavages of the p-amyloid precursor protein and the site 3 (S3) protease cleavage of Notch. These intramembrane cleavages release amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta), including the pathogenic 42-aa variant (Abeta(42)), as well as the beta-amyloid precursor protein and the Notch intracellular domains (AICD, NICD). Whereas Abeta is generated by endoproteolysis in the middle of the transmembrane domain, AICID and NICD are generated by cleavages at analogous positions close to the cytoplasmic border of the transmembrane domain. Numerous mutations causing familial AD (FAD) that all cause increased production of Abeta(42) have been found in the PS1 gene. Here we have investigated the previously uncharacterized, very aggressive FAD mutation L166P that causes onset of AD in adolescence. Strikingly, the PS1 L166P mutation not only induces an exceptionally high increase of Abeta(42) production but also impairs NICD production and Notch signaling, as well as AICD generation. Thus, FAD-associated PS mutants cannot only affect the generation of NICD, but also that of AlCD. Moreover, further analysis with artificial L166 mutants revealed that the gamma-secretase cleavage at position 40/42 and the S3-like gamma-secretase cleavage at position 49 of the Abeta domain are both differentially affected by PS1 L166 mutants. Finally, we show that PS1 L166 mutants affect the generation of NICD and AlCD in a similar manner, supporting the concept that S3 protease and S3-like gamma-secretase cleavages are mediated by identical proteolytic activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据