4.6 Article

Chemotactic factor-induced recruitment and activation of Tec family kinases in human neutrophils - Implication of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 24, 页码 21537-21541

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M201903200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The importance of the tyrosine phosphorylation cascades in the initiation and regulation of the functional responsiveness of human neutrophils is well established. On the other hand, the link between the G protein-coupled receptors (to which the receptors for chemotactic factors belong) and the activation of tyrosine kinases is very poorly characterized. Based on previous observations indicating that the stimulation of tyrosine phosphorylation was sensitive to inhibition by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin and the recent description of pleckstrin homology domain-containing tyrosine kinases (the Tee family), we have examined the potential implication of the latter in the responses of human neutrophils to chemotactic factors. The results obtained indicate firstly that several members of the Tee family of tyrosine kinases are expressed in human neutrophils, including Tee, Btk, and Bmx. Stimulation of the cells with fMet-Leu-Phe led to a rapid activation of Tee as indicated by its translocation to a membrane fraction and to increases in its in situ level of tyrosine phosphorylation and its capacity to tyrosine phosphorylate itself or an exogenous substrate (SAM68-GST) in in vitro kinase assays. The activation of Tee was inhibited by pertussis toxin as well as by wortmannin. The results of this study provide direct evidence for the implication of Tee family kinases in the responses of human neutrophils to chemotactic factors. They also suggest that one of the links between G protein-coupled receptors and tyrosine kinases depends on the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and the generation of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据