4.2 Article

Mutations in Fks1p affect the cell wall content of β-1,3-and β-1,6-glucan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

YEAST
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 671-690

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/yea.866

关键词

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; cell wall; beta-1,3-glucan; beta-1,6-glucan; Fks1p; Fks2p; Gas1p; KRE genes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fks1p and Fks2p are related proteins thought to be catalytic subunits of the beta-1,3-glucan synthase. Analysis of fks1Delta mutants showed a partial K1 killer toxin-resistant phenotype and a 30% reduction in alkali-soluble beta-1,3-glucan that was accompanied by a modest reduction in beta-1,6-glucan. The gas1Delta mutant lacking a 1,3-beta-glucanosyltransferase displayed a similar reduction in alkali-soluble beta-1,3-glucan but did not share the beta-1, 6-glucan defect, indicating that beta-1,6-glucan reduction is not a general phenotype among beta-1,3-glucan biosynthetic mutants. Overexpression of FKS2 suppressed the killer toxin phenotype of fks1Delta mutants, implicating Fks2p in the biosynthesis of the residual beta-1, 6-glucan present in fks1Delta cells. In addition, eight out of 12 fks1(ts) fks2Delta mutants had altered beta-glucan levels at the permissive temperature: the partial killer resistant FKS1(F1258Y) (N1520D) allele was severely affected in both polymers and displayed a 55% reduction in beta-1,6-glucan, while the in vitro hyperactive allele FKS1(T6051 M761T) increased both beta-glucan levels. These beta-1,6-glucan phenotypes may be due to altered availability of, and structural changes in, the beta-1,3-glucan polymer, which might serve as a beta-1,6-glucan acceptor at the cell surface. Alternatively, Fks1p and Fks2p could actively participate in the biosynthesis of both polymers as beta-glucan transporters. We analysed Fks1p and Fks2p in beta-1,6-glucan deficient mutants and found that they were mislocalized and that the mutants had reduced in vitro glucan synthase activity, possibly contributing to the observed beta-1,6-glucan defects. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据