4.6 Review

Review Progress in Ostwald ripening theories and their applications to the γ′-precipitates in nickel-base superalloys -: Part II -: Nickel-base superalloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 2379-2405

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015408116016

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Lifshitz-Slyozof-Wagner (LSW) theory, which corresponds to a zero volume fraction approximation, was developed to model kinetics of precipitate growth from supersaturated solid solutions. The subsequent modifications of the LSW theory for the incorporations of various factors including volume fractions of precipitates to fit the experimental data from the coarsening precipitates were made by various workers during last twenty five years. The LSW theory and its modifications have been applied on the diffusion-controlled Ostwald ripening of the gamma' precipitate particles [Ni-3(Al,Ti)] in nickel-based superalloys. The important Ostwald ripening theories were reviewed in the part I of this paper, and the coarsening characteristics of the gamma'-precipitates in Ni-base high temperature superalloys are presented in detail in relation to these theories in the present part. A model developed by D. McLean can be used to predict the gamma' particle growth over service lifetimes in the case of relatively Al-rich nickel-base superalloys. Additional fundamental data (such as the precipitate-matrix interfacial energy, diffusivity of the component species of the particle, and the equilibrium solubility with a particle in nickel-based superalloys) can be obtained from experimental results for coarsening, if the concentration changes during coarsening can be measured precisely, using the methods developed by A. J. Ardell. Furthermore, the factors affecting the shape changes and splitting of the gamma' precipitate particles during the coarsening were also considered seperately since the classical Ostwald ripening theories can not explain the morphological changes. (C) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据