4.6 Article

The Trypanosoma cruzi Tc52-released protein induces human dendritic cell maturation, signals via toll-like receptor 2, and confers protection against lethal infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 168, 期 12, 页码 6366-6374

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6366

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intracellular protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi is the etiological agent of Chagas disease. We have recently identified a T. cruzi-released protein related to thiol-disulfide oxidoreductase family, called Tc52, which is crucial for parasite survival and virulence. In vitro, Tc52 in combination with IFN-gamma activates human macrophages. In vivo, active immunization with Tc52 relieves the immunosuppression associated to acute infection and elicits a specific immune response. As dendritic cells (DC) have a central role in the initiation of immune responses, we investigated whether Tc52 may modulate DC activity. We show that Tc52 induces human DC maturation. Tc52-treated immature DC acquire CD83 and CD86 expression, produce inflammatory chemokines (IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and macrophage-inflammatory protein-la), and present potent costimulatory properties. Tc52 binds to DC by a mechanism with the characteristics of a saturable receptor system and signals via Toll-like receptor 2. While Tc52-mediated signaling involves its reduced glutathione-binding site, another portion of the molecule is involved in Tc52 binding to DC. Finally, we report that immunization with Tc52 protects mice in vivo against lethal infection with T. cruzi. Together these data evidence complex molecular interactions between the T. cruzi-derived molecule, Tc52, and DC, and suggest that Tc52 and related class of proteins might represent a new type of pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Moreover, the immune protection data suggest that Tc52 is among candidate molecules that may be used to design an optimal multicomponent vaccine to control T. cruzi infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据