4.7 Article

Systemic inflammation in unstable angina is the result of myocardial necrosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 1917-1923

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01899-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether the source of the acute phase response in unstable angina (UA) lay within the culprit coronary plaque or distal myocardium. BACKROUND An inflammatory response is an important component of the acute coronary syndromes. However, its origin and mechanism remain unclear. METHODS In 94 stable patients undergoing coronary angiography, the relationship between systemic levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and extent of atherosclerosis was studied. The temporal relationship between these markers and troponin T (TnT) was determined in 91 patients with UA. Cytokine levels were measured in the aortic root and coronary sinus of 36 unstable patients. RESULTS There was no relationship found between stable coronary atherosclerosis and inflammatory marker levels. Compared with this group, admission levels of IL-6 (3.6 +/- 0.3 ng/ml vs. 10.7 +/- 1.7 ng/ml p < 0.05) and CRP (2.3 +/- 0.1 mg/l vs. 4.6 +/- 0.6 mg/l, p < 0.05) were elevated in patients with UA. In this group, IL-6 and CRP remained elevated in those who subsequently experienced major adverse cardiac events. This inflammatory response occurred in parallel to the appearance of TnT. Both TNF-alpha (19.2 +/- 3.4 ng/ml vs. 17.1 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, p < 0.001) and IL-6 (10.3 +/- 1.4 ng/ml vs. 7.7 +/- 1.1 ng/ml, p < 0.01) were elevated in the coronary sinus compared with aortic root in patients with UA. This was principally observed in those who were TnT positive. There was no cytokine gradient across the culprit plaque. CONCLUSIONS There is an intracardiac inflammatory response in UA that appears to be the result of low-grade myocardial necrosis. The ruptured plaque does not appear to contribute to the acute phase response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据