4.8 Article

Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 346, 期 25, 页码 1948-1953

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012369

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In cardiac syndrome X (a syndrome characterized by typical angina, abnormal exercise-test results, and normal coronary arteries), conventional investigations have not found that chest pain is due to myocardial ischemia. Magnetic resonance techniques have higher resolution and therefore may be more sensitive. Methods: We performed myocardial-perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in 20 patients with syndrome X and 10 matched controls, both at rest and during an infusion of adenosine. Quantitative perfusion analysis was performed by using the normalized upslope of myocardial signal enhancement to derive the myocardial perfusion index and the myocardial-perfusion reserve index (defined as the ratio of the myocardial perfusion index during stress to the index at rest). Results: In the controls, the myocardial perfusion index increased in both myocardial layers with adenosine (in the subendocardium, from a mean [+/-SD] of 0.12+/-0.03 to 0.16+/-0.03 [P=0.02]; in the subepicardium, from 0.11+/-0.02 to 0.17+/-0.05 [P=0.002]); in patients with syndrome X, the myocardial perfusion index did not change significantly in the subendocardium (0.13+/-0.02 vs. 0.14+/-0.03, P=0.11; P=0.09 as compared with controls) but increased in the subepicardium (from 0.11+/-0.02 to 0.20+/-0.04, P<0.001; P=0.11 for the comparison with controls). Adenosine provoked chest pain in 95 percent of patients with syndrome X and 40 percent of controls (P<0.001). Conclusions: In patients with syndrome X, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates subendocardial hypoperfusion during the intravenous administration of adenosine, which is associated with intense chest pain. These data support the notion that the chest pain may have an ischemic cause.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据