4.7 Article

Dominant regulation of interendothelial cell gap formation by calcium-inhibited type 6 adenylyl cyclase

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 157, 期 7, 页码 1267-1278

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200204022

关键词

adenosine 3 ',5 '-cyclic monophosphate; cAMP; store-operated calcium entry; thrombin; permeability

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL066299, R01 HL60024, P01 HL66299, R01 HL060024] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM32483, R01 GM032483] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cute transitions in cytosolic calcium ([Ca2+]i) through store-operated calcium entry channels catalyze interendothelial cell gap formation that increases permeability. However, the rise in [Ca2(+)]i only disrupts barrier function in the absence of a rise in cAMP. Discovery that type 6 adenylyl cyclase (AC(6); EC 4.6.6.1) is inhibited by calcium entry through store-operated calcium entry pathways provided a plausible explanation for how inflammatory [Ca2+]i mediators may decrease cAMP necessary for endothelial cell gap formation. [Ca2(+)]i mediators only modestly decrease global cAMP concentrations and thus, to date, the physiological role of AC(6) is unresolved. Present studies used an adenoviral construct that expresses the calcium-stimulated AC(8) to convert normal calcium inhibition into stimulation of cAMP, within physiologically relevant concentration ranges. Thrombin stimulated a dose-dependent [Ca2(+)]i rise in both pulmonary artery (PAECs) and microvascular (PMVEC) endothelial cells, and promoted intercellular gap formation in both cell types. In PAECs, gap formation was progressive over 2 h, whereas in PMVECs, gap formation was rapid (within 10 min) and gaps resealed within 2 h. Expression of AC8 resulted in a modest calcium stimulation of cAMP, which virtually abolished thrombin-induced gap formation in PMVECs. Findings provide the first direct evidence that calcium inhibition of AC(6) is essential for endothelial gap formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据