4.5 Article

Evaluation of a recombinant Klebsiella oxytoca strain for ethanol production from cellulose by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation:: comparison with native cellobiose-utilising yeast strains and performance in co-culture with thermotolerant yeast and Zymomonas mobilis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 96, 期 2, 页码 155-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00026-3

关键词

simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; Klebsiella oxytoca P2; cellobiose-utilising yeasts; co-culture; thermotolerant yeasts; Zymomonas mobilis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation to ethanol of 100 g 1(-1) microcrystalline cellulose, the cellobiose-fermenting recombinant Klebsiella oxytoca P2 outperformed a range of cellobiose-fermenting yeasts used in earlier work, despite producing less ethanol than reported earlier for this organism under similar conditions. The time taken by K. oxytoca P2 to produce up to about 33 g 1(-1) ethanol was much less than for any other organism investigated, including ethanol-tolerant strains of Saccharomyces pastorianus, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Zymomonas mobilis. Ultimately, it produced slightly less ethanol (maximum 36 g 1(-1)) than these organisms, reflecting its lower ethanol tolerance. Significant advantages were obtained by co-culturing K. oxytoca P2 with S. pastorianus, K. marxianus or Z. mobilis, either isothermally, or in conjunction with temperature-profiling to raise the cellulase activity. Co-cultures produced significantly more ethanol, more rapidly, than either of the constituent strains in pure culture at the same inoculum density. K. oxytoca P2 dominated the early stages of the co-cultures, with ethanol production in the later stages due principally to the more ethanol tolerant strain. The usefulness of K. oxytoca P2 in cellulose simultaneous saccharification and fermentation should be improved by mutation of the strain to increase its ethanol tolerance. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据