4.7 Article

Interaction of the anorectic medication, phendimetrazine, and its metabolites with monoamine transporters in rat brain

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 447, 期 1, 页码 51-57

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01830-7

关键词

phendimetrazine; phenmetrazine; dopamine; norepinephrine; microdialysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phendimetrazine is an effective and widely prescribed appetite suppressant. Preclinical findings show that phendimetrazine displays stimulant properties similar to amphetamine, but few studies have examined the neurochemical mechanism of the drug. In the present work, we characterize the activity of phendimetrazine and its putative metabolites [phenmetrazine, pseudophenmetrazine, and associated stereoisomers] at biogenic amine transporters. All drugs were tested in vitro using assays to measure uptake and release of [H-3]dopamine, [H-3]norepinephrine, and [H-3]serotonin ([H-3]5-HT) in rat brain synaptosomes. Selected drugs were tested in vivo using microdialysis to measure extracellular dopamine and serotonin (5-HT) in rat nucleus accumbens. Phendimetrazine itself had no effect on uptake or release of any transmitter. In contrast, the trans-configured N-demethylated metabolite, phenmetrazine, was a potent releaser of [H-3]norepinephrine (EC50 = 50 nM) and [H-3]dopamine (EC50 = 131 nM). The cis N-demethylated metabolite, pseudophenmetrazine, displayed modest potency at releasing [H-3]norepinephrine (EC50 514 nM) and blocking [H-3]dopamine re-uptake (IC50 = 2630 nM). All drugs tested were inactive or weak in the [H-3]5-HT assays. When injected intravenously, phendimetrazine had minimal effects on extracellular transmitter levels, whereas phenmetrazine produced dose-related elevations in extracellular dopamine. The collective findings suggest that phendimetrazine is a prodrug that is converted to the active metabolite phenmetrazine, a potent substrate for norepinephrine and dopamine transporters. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据