4.5 Article

Regenerative and survival capabilities of Purkinje cells overexpressing c-Jun

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 105-118

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02077.x

关键词

axotomy; cerebellum; GAP-43; growth-associated genes; phosphorylation; transgenic mice

资金

  1. Telethon [1198] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following axotomy, cerebellar Purkinje cells (PCs) do not elongate their axons, even in a favourable environment, and are resistant to death. They have no constitutive presence of common growth-associated proteins, such as GAP-43 and c-Jun Previous experiments show that injured transgenic PCs overexpressing GAP-43 exhibit a profuse sprouting along the axon and at its severed end. Nevertheless, the lesioned axons are unable to regenerate either spontaneously or into growth-permissive environments. In addition, a considerable number of GAP-43 transgenic PCs degenerate after injury. c-Jun is an inducible transcription factor expressed in axotomized central neurons and regenerating peripheral neurons. It also contributes to programmed cell death during development. To test whether c-Jun could modify the response of PCs to axotomy or enhance the growth/death phenomena of GAP-43 Purkinje neurons, we generated transgenic mice overexpressing c-Jun in PCs. However, c-Jun upregulation did not affect the adult intact phenotype of these neurons and their regenerative and survival capabilities after axotomy. Also in the cross-bred GAP-43/c-Jun mice, c-Jun did not modify the response of GAP-43 PCs to axotomy. By contrast, in organotypic cultures of cerebellum taken from 9-day-old-pups, the survival capabilities of PCs overexpressing c-Jun decreased, in association with a consistent c-Jun phosphorylation. On the whole our data show that c-Jun alone is unable to trigger regenerative or degenerative phenomena in PCs and suggest that the cellular action of this early gene in developing and mature neurons strongly depends on interplaying intracellular signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据