4.6 Article

A search for OH megamasers at z > 0.1.: III.: The complete survey

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 124, 期 1, 页码 100-126

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/341166

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : interactions; galaxies : star clusters; infrared radiation; radio emission lines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the final results from the Arecibo Observatory(1) OH megamaser survey. We discuss in detail the properties of the remaining 18 OH megamasers detected in the survey, including three redetections. We place upper limits on the OH emission from 85 nondetections and examine the properties of 25 ambiguous cases for which the presence or absence of OH emission could not be determined. The complete survey has discovered 50 new OH megamasers ( OHMs) in ( ultra) luminous infrared galaxies ( [ U] LIRGs), which doubles the sample of known OHMs and increases the sample at z > 0.1 sevenfold. The Arecibo OH megamaser survey indicates that the OHM fraction in LIRGs is an increasing function of the far-IR luminosity (L-FIR) and far-IR color, reaching a fraction of roughly 1/3 in the warmest ULIRGs. Significant relationships between OHMs and their hosts are few, primarily because of a mismatch in size scales of measured properties and an intrinsic scatter in OHM properties roughly equal to the span of the data set. We investigate relationships between OHMs and their hosts with a variety of statistical tools including survival analysis, partial correlation coefficients, and a principal component analysis. There is no apparent OH megamaser fundamental plane. We compile data on all previously known OHMs and evaluate the possible mechanisms and relationships responsible for OHM production in merging systems. The OH-FIR relationship is reexamined by using the doubled OHM sample and found to be significantly flatter than previously thought: L-OH proportional to L-FIR(1.2+0.1). This nearly linear dependence suggests a mixture of saturated and unsaturated masers, either within individual galaxies or across the sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据