4.7 Article

Iron absorption in breast-fed infants:: effects of age, iron status, iron supplements, and complementary foods

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 198-204

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/76.1.198

关键词

infants; human milk; breast milk; nonheme-iron absorption; stable isotopes; iron status; dietary iron intake; complementary food; iron supplements; dietary regulator; adaptation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Iron supplements are often recommended for older breast-fed infants, but little is known about factors affecting iron absorption from human milk or supplements. Objective: We investigated the effects of age, iron status, and iron intake on iron absorption in healthy, term, breast-fed infants. Design: Twenty-five infants were randomly assigned to receive either 1) iron supplements 1 mg(.)kg(-1.)d(-1)) from 4 to 9 mo of age, 2) placebo from 4 to 6 mo and iron supplements from 6 to 9 mo, or 3) placebo from 4 to 9 mo. Infants were exclusively breast-fed to 6 mo and partially breast-fed to 9 mo of age. Iron absorption was assessed by giving Fe-58 with mother's milk at 6 and 9 mo. Blood samples were obtained at 4, 6, and 9 mo, and complementary food intake was recorded at 9 mo. Results: At 6 mo, mean (+/-SD) fractional iron absorption from human milk was relatively low (16.4 +/- 11.4%), with no significant difference between iron-supplemented and unsupplemented infants. At 9 mo, iron absorption from human milk remained low in iron-supplemented infants (16.9 +/- 9.3%) but was higher (P = 0.01) in unsupplemented infants (36.7 +/- 18.9%). Unexpectedly, iron absorption at 9 mo was not correlated with iron status but was significantly correlated with intake of dietary iron, including supplemental iron. Conclusions: Changes in the regulation of iron absorption between 6 and 9 mo enhance the infant's ability to adapt to a low-iron diet and provide a mechanism by which some, but not all, infants avoid iron deficiency despite low iron intakes in late infancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据