4.6 Article

Terminal bronchioles harbor a unique airway stem cell population that localizes to the bronchoalveolar duct junction

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 161, 期 1, 页码 173-182

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64169-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL70575, R01 HL064888, HL64888, R01 HL070575] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES008964, ES07026, T32 ES007026, ES08964, R01 ES007026] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular mechanisms contributing to renewal of terminal bronchioles remain, poorly defined. Our previous studies identified pollutant-resistant Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP)-expressing stem cells that localize to the neuroepithelial body (NEB) and contribute to renewal of the proximal bronchiolar epithelium. However, activation of NEB-associated stem cells is unlikely to contribute to renewal of terminal bronchiolar epithelium because of the paucity of NEBs at this location. Goals of this study were to determine the location and properties of cells contributing to renewal of terminal bronchioles after Clara cell depletion. Pollutant-resistant CCSP-expressing cells were identified that localized to the bronchoalveolar duct junction (BADJ) and contribute to restoration of a phenotypically diverse epithelium. CCSP-expressing cells comprise the predominant proliferative population in initial terminal bronchiolar repair and include a population of label-retaining cells suggesting that they maintain characteristics of a stem cell population. Furthermore, immunohistochemical co-localization studies involving CCSP and the NEB-specific marker calcitonin gene-related peptide indicate that BADJ-associated CCSP-expressing stem cells function independently of NEB microenvironments. These studies identify a BADJ-associated, NEB-independent, CCSP-expressing stem cell population in terminal. bronchioles and support the notion that regiospecific stein cell niches function to maintain epithelial. diversity after injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据