4.5 Article

Physical exercise increases autophagic signaling through ULK1 in human skeletal muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 8, 页码 971-979

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01116.2014

关键词

autophagy signaling; exercise training; skeletal muscle; nutritional status; ULK1; human

资金

  1. Danish Council for Strategic Research (Keto-group) [0603-00479B]
  2. Beckett Foundation
  3. Danish PhD Schools of Metabolism and Endocrinology (SUND, SDU) [94-101-12676]
  4. A. P. Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  5. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0007869] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data from transgenic animal models suggest that exercise-induced autophagy is critical for adaptation to physical training, and that Unc-51 like kinase-1 (ULK1) serves as an important regulator of autophagy. Phosphorylation of ULK1 at Ser(555) stimulates autophagy, whereas phosphorylation at Ser(757) is inhibitory. To determine whether exercise regulates ULK1 phosphorylation in humans in vivo in a nutrient-dependent manner, we examined skeletal muscle biopsies from healthy humans after 1-h cycling exercise at 50% maximal O-2 uptake on two occasions: 1) during a 36-h fast, and 2) during continuous glucose infusion at 0.2 kg/h. Physical exercise increased ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser(555) and decreased lipidation of light chain 3B. ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser(555) correlated positively with AMP-activated protein kinase-alpha Thr(172) phosphorylation and negatively with light chain 3B lipidation. ULK1 phosphorylation at Ser(757) was not affected by exercise. Fasting increased ULK1 and p62 protein expression, but did not affect exercise-induced ULK1 phosphorylation. These data demonstrate that autophagy signaling is activated in human skeletal muscle after 60 min of exercise, independently of nutritional status, and suggest that initiation of autophagy constitutes an important physiological response to exercise in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据