4.5 Article

Caffeine improves performance in double poling during acute exposure to 2,000-m altitude

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 12, 页码 1501-1509

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00509.2015

关键词

exercise performance; hypoxia; heart rate; rate of perceived exertion; and oxygen consumption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is limited research on the physiological effects of caffeine (CAF) ingestion on exercise performance during acute hypoxia. The aim of the present study was therefore to test the effect of placebo (PLA) and CAF (4.5 mg/kg) on double poling (DP) performance during acute hypoxia. Thirteen male subelite cross-country skiers ((V) over dotO(2max) 72.6 +/- 5.68 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)) were included. Performance was assessed as 1) an 8-km cross-country DP time-trial (C-PT), and 2) time until task failure at a set workload equal to similar to 90% of DP (V) over dotO(2max). Testing was carried out in a hypobaric chamber, at 800 mbar (PIO2: similar to 125 mmHg) corresponding to similar to 2,000 m above sea level in a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over design. CAF improved time to task failure from 6.10 +/- 1.40 to 7.22 +/- 1.30 min (P < 0.05) and velocity the first 4 km (P < 0.05) but not overall time usage for the 8-km C-PT. During submaximal exercise subjects reported lower pain in arms and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) following CAF ingestion. Throughout C-PTs similar RPE and pain was shown between treatments. However, higher heart rate was observed during the CAF 8 km (187 +/- 7 vs. 185 +/- 7; P < 0.05) and 90% C-PT (185 +/- 7 vs. 181 +/- 9) associated with increased ventilation, blood lactate, glucose, adrenaline, decreased pH, and bicarbonate. The present study demonstrates for the first time that CAF ingestion improves DP time to task failure although not consistently time trial performance during acute exposure to altitude. Mechanisms underpinning improvements seem related to reduced pain RPE and increased heart rate during CAF C-PTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据