4.7 Article

Detection of parvovirus B19NS1-specific antibodies by ELISA and Western blotting employing recombinant NS1 protein as antigen

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 375-383

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.10079

关键词

antibody; baculovirus expression system; conformational epitopes; diagnosis; immunoglobulin; sensitivity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human parvovirus B19 (1319) encodes a number of nonstructural proteins, including the major protein, NS1, and two structural proteins, VP1 and VP2. The use of denatured NS1 in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot (WB) assay has provided an opportunity to study some of the immunologic properties of NS1, but the results have been equivocal and the diagnostic sensitivity poor, probably because of the absence of conformational epitopes. Various viral isolates and baculovirus vectors were employed to produce recombinant B19 NS1 under nondenaturing conditions for the first time. To assess the antigenicity of purified B19 NS1, the reaction patterns of 252 samples were compared by B19 NS1 and VP2 ELISA. In sera from individuals with past infection (VP2 IgG-positive), the use of this new antigen increased significantly the sensitivity of ELISA compared with WB (78% vs. 33%, P = 0.001), contradicting perpetuated claims that B19 NS1 IgG is detected primarily in patients with arthralgia or chronic infection. Previous reports of the absence of NS1 IgG during the initial phase of infection (< 6 weeks) were proved incorrect by the detection of NS1 IgG in 60% of samples from patients recently infected by B19. Including conformational epitopes in the ELISA increases the diagnostic sensitivity, although immunologically, a temporal (years) attenuation of NS1 antibodies appears to take place. This novel diagnostic tool may be useful as a supplement in case of borderline results by VP2 ELISA and for monitoring the efficacy of future capsid-based B19 vaccines. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据