4.5 Article

Muscle strength as a predictor of loss of functional status in hospitalized patients

期刊

NUTRITION
卷 18, 期 7-8, 页码 616-620

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00756-6

关键词

nutritional evaluation; muscle strength; Subjective Global Assessment; maximal inspiratory pressure; maximal expiratory pressure; handgrip dynamometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of protein-calorie malnutrition in hospitalized adult patients can reach 30% to 50% and adversely affect clinical Outcome. We evaluated the efficacy of muscle strength to predict functional derangement and detect early changes in nutrition status in hospitalized patients. METHODS: Patients hospitalized at medical and surgical wards from two different hospitals in Santiago, Chile. were studied during their hospital stay. Subjective Global Assessment of nutrition status and laboratory parameters were measured on admission. Anthropometric measures, handgrip dynamometry. and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures were measured on admission and discharge. The Karnofsky index was used to assess functional status, Twice weekly, caloric balance was calculated with indirect calorimetry and assessment of dietary intake. RESULTS: From the initial selection of patients (n = 70). 50 patients (26 men and 24 women) completed the study. Median hospital stay,vas 10 d. Subjective Global Assessment was associated with anthropometric data. handgrip dynamometry. and serum levels of total proteins. Patients in whom functional status declined during hospital stay. on admission had lower left handgrip strength, a worse Subjective Global Assessment classification. were older. and had lower fat mass. No association between caloric balance during hospital stay and changes in muscle strength was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective Global Assessment, hand.-rip strength. and fat mass were good predictors for the decline in functional status during hospital stay. No association between calorie balance and changes in muscle strength was observed. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2002.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据