4.5 Article

Trichostatin A, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, modulates unloaded-induced skeletal muscle atrophy

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 342-351

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01031.2014

关键词

hypokinesia; histone acetylation; oxidative stress; proteolysis

资金

  1. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skeletal muscle atrophy is commonly associated with immobilization, ageing, and catabolic diseases such as diabetes and cancer cachexia. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression resulting from chromatin remodeling through histone acetylation has been implicated in muscle disuse. The present work was designed to test the hypothesis that treatment with trichostatin A (TSA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, would partly counteract unloading-induced muscle atrophy. Soleus muscle atrophy (-38%) induced by 14 days of rat hindlimb suspension was reduced to only 25% under TSA treatment. TSA partly prevented the loss of type I and IIa fiber size and reversed the transitions of slow-twitch to fast-twitch fibers in soleus muscle. Unloading or TSA treatment did not affect myostatin gene expression and follistatin protein. Soleus protein carbonyl content remained unchanged, whereas the decrease in glutathione vs. glutathione disulfide ratio and the increase in catalase activity (biomarkers of oxidative stress) observed after unloading were abolished by TSA treatment. The autophagy-lysosome pathway (Bnip3 and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 proteins, Atg5, Gabarapl1, Ulk1, and cathepsin B and L mRNA) was not activated by unloading or TSA treatment. However, TSA suppressed the rise in muscle-specific RING finger protein 1 (MuRF1) caused by unloading without affecting the forkhead box (Foxo3) transcription factor. Prevention of muscle atrophy by TSA might be due to the regulation of the skeletal muscle atrophy-related MuRF1 gene. Our findings suggest that TSA may provide a novel avenue to treat unloaded-induced muscle atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据