4.7 Article

Distinct in vivo expression patterns of survivin splice variants in renal cell carcinomas

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 30-36

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10450

关键词

survivin; renal cell carcinoma; apoptosis; inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP)

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Survivin, a novel member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family, reduces the susceptibility of tumor cells to proapoptotic stimuli, thereby promoting tumor cell survival during tumor progression and treatment with anticancer drugs. Recently, we identified 2 novel alternative splice variants of survivin, survivin-2B and survivin-DeltaEx3, which differ in their antiapoptotic properties. Survivin-2B has lost its antiapoptotic potential and may act as a naturally occurring antagonist of antiapoptotic survivin and survivin-DeltaEx3. Because the in vivo expression of these splice variants in human cancer has not been analyzed so far, 57 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) were explored using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. We found that all RCCs express survivin-DeltaEx3, survivin-2B and survivin, the latter being the dominant transcript. When we compared early and intermediate stages with late stages of clear cell RCCs, no significant changes in the expression levels of survivin and survivin-DeltaEx3 became evident. However, a significant decrease was observed for the mRNA ratio between survivin-2B and survivin in late tumor stages (p = 0.036). Chromophilic/papillary RCCs, which are known to be less aggressive than clear cell RCCs, did not show significantly lower expression levels of antiapoptotic survivin and survivin-DeltaEx3, compared with stage-adjusted clear cell RCCs. Our study demonstrates for the first time in vivo expression of functionally different survivin variants and suggests a role of these survivin splice variants in the progression and clinical behavior of human RCCs. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据