4.3 Article

A comparison of the femoral head and neck trabecular architecture of Galago and Perodicticus using micro-computed tomography (μCT)

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 89-105

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0559

关键词

anisotropy; bone volume density; lorisoid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Innovations in micro-computed tomography (muCT) in the medical field have resulted in the development of techniques that allow the precise quantification of bone density and fabric related parameters of trabecular bone. For the purpose of this study, the technique was applied to a small sample of Perodicticus potto and Galago senegalensis femora to see if differences in loading environment elicit the predicted effects on trabecular structure. While the overall bone volume was approximately three times larger in the potto, there was no significant difference in the apparent volume density in the two taxa. When regional differences in the proximal femur were examined, the cancellous bone of the femoral head of Perodicticus potto and Galago senegalensis, while not differing in volume density, showed differences in trabecular orientation, with the potto having more randomly oriented trabeculae than the bushbaby. This was as hypothesized, given that the bushbaby submits its femora to more stereotypical loading environments than the potto. In the femoral neck, the cancellous bone was not only more randomly oriented, it was also denser in the potto compared with the bushbaby. This suggests that trabecular morphology may be extremely sensitive to certain differences in the loading environment and that this information, combined with information on cortical bone structure and external geometry, will result in a more complete understanding of how bone shape and composition correspond to loading and locomotor patterns. Ultimately, a synthesis of these different lines of evidence may have considerable applications in paleontological studies that attempt to reconstruct bone use from morphology. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据