4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome

期刊

LARYNGOSCOPE
卷 112, 期 7, 页码 1178-1182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200207000-00006

关键词

cochlear implant; large vestibular aqueduct syndrome; Mondini malformation

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [T32 DC00012, R01 DC00064, K23 DC00126] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. In this investigation, we report the outcomes of 14 adults (age > 18 y) and 9 children (age < 18 y) with radiographically proven large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) who received cochlear implants at Indiana University School of Medicine. Study Design: This is a retrospective case-control study detailing the outcomes of 23 patients with LVAS and 46 control patients implanted with Nucleus (Cochlear Corp., Englewood, CO), Clarion (Advanced Bionics Corp., Sylmar, CA), or Med-El (MED-EL Corp., Innsbruck, Austria) cochlear implants. Methods: Performance data on pure-tone averages, speech detection thresholds, and a variety of auditory and speech recognition tasks from these patients with LVAS were compared with performance data obtained from a matched group of 46 cochlear implant users who did not have LVAS. Specific patient characteristics used in matching included the age of the patient, the age at implant of the patient, and whether the patient was pre- or postlingually deafened. Data for the adult group was analyzed using the Student t test, and data for the pediatric patient group was compared using a chi(2) test. Results: The results indicated positive outcomes for both pediatric and adult groups. With both adult and pediatric groups, auditory and speech recognition performance did not differ significantly between those patients with LVAS and control subjects. Conclusions: This study adds further support for the use of cochlear implantation in patients with LVAS. Cochlear implantation is beneficial and can be offered as an eventual treatment of LVAS if hearing loss progresses to profound levels in these patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据