4.7 Review

Choreography of oxidative damage repair in mammalian genomes

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 15-28

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00819-5

关键词

free radicals; DNA damage; base excision repair; organelle targeting; chromatin unfolding; coordination of repair reactions

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA81063, CA84461, R01 CA084461, CA53791] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG10514] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES06676, P30 ES006676, ES08457] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lesions induced by reactive oxygen species in both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes include altered bases, abasic (AP) sites, and single-strand breaks, all repaired primarily via the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Although the basic BER process (consisting of five sequential steps) could be reconstituted in vitro with only four enzymes, it is now evident that repair of oxidative damage, at least in mammalian cell nuclei, is more complex, and involves a number of additional proteins, including transcription- and replication-associated factors. These proteins may be required in sequential repair steps in concert with other cellular changes, starting with nuclear targeting of the early repair enzymes in response to oxidative stress, facilitation of lesion recognition, and access by chromatin unfolding via histone acetylation, and formation of metastable complexes of repair enzymes and other accessory proteins, Distinct, specific subclasses of protein complexes may be formed for repair of oxidative lesions in the nucleus in transcribed vs. nontranscribed sequences in chromatin, in quiescent vs. cycling cells, and in nascent vs. parental DNA strands in replicating cells. Characterizing the proteins for each repair subpathway, their signaling-dependent modifications and interactions in the nuclear as well as mitochondrial repair complexes, will be a major focus of future research in oxidative damage repair. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据