4.6 Article

The shared allelic architecture of adiponectin levels and coronary artery disease

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 229, 期 1, 页码 145-148

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.034

关键词

Adiponectin; Coronary artery disease; Atherosclerosis; Gene; Association; SNP

资金

  1. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  3. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec
  4. Lady Davis Institute
  5. Jewish General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: A large body of epidemiologic data strongly suggests an association between excess adiposity and coronary artery disease (CAD). Low adiponectin levels, a hormone secreted only from adipocytes, have been associated with an increased risk of CAD in observational studies. However, these associations cannot clarify whether this relationship is causal or due to a shared set of causal factors or even confounding. Genome-wide association studies have identified common variants that influence adiponectin levels, providing valuable tools to examine the genetic relationship between adiponectin and CAD. Methods: Using 145 genome wide significant SNPs for adiponectin from the ADIPOGen consortium (n = 49,891), we tested whether adiponectin-decreasing alleles influenced risk of CAD in the CARDIoGRAM consortium (n = 85,274). Results: In single-SNP analysis, 5 variants among 145 SNPs were associated with increased risk of CAD after correcting for multiple testing (P < 4.4 x 10(-4)). Using a multi-SNP genotypic risk score to test whether adiponectin levels and CAD have a shared genetic etiology, we found that adiponectin-decreasing alleles increased risk of CAD (P = 5.4 x 10(-7)). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that adiponectin levels and CAD have a shared allelic architecture and provide rationale to undertake a Mendelian randomization studies to understand if this relationship is causal. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据