4.3 Article

Darusentan:: An effective endothelinA receptor antagonist for treatment of hypertension

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 583-589

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(02)02933-3

关键词

endothelin receptor antagonist; darusentan; hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of darusentan, a new selective endothelin(A) antagonist was investigated. Methods: In a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study, a 2-week placebo run-in period was followed by a 6-week treatment period and then a 2-week placebo withdrawal period. At baseline before darusentan therapy, the average blood pressure (BP) of the patient population studied was diastolic 103.49 (SD 3.55) and systolic 168.27 (SD 16.63) mm Hg. In total, 392 patients were randomized (darusentan 10 mg: 94 patients, 30 mg: 103 patients, 100 mg: 96 patients, placebo: 99 patients). Results: Darusentan significantly reduced diastolic (mean difference to placebo: 10 mg: -3.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (Cl): -6.6, -0.9. P = .009; 30 mg: -4.9 mm Hg, 95% CI: -7.7. -2.2. P = .0005: 100 mg: -8.3 mm Hg, 95% Cl: -11.1, -5.5, P = .0001) and systolic BP (mean difference to placebo: 10 mg: -6.0 mm Hg, 95% CI: -11.0, -0.9, P = .02; 30 mg: -7.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -12.3, -2.4, P = .004, 100 mg: -11.3 mm Hg, 95% CI: -16.3. -6.2, P = .0001). Pulse rate remained unchanged in all groups. There was a trend toward more adverse events in the active treatment groups (placebo: 30.3%, 10 mg: 44.7%. 30 mg: 40.8%. 100 mg: 49.0%). Headache was the most commonly reported adverse event, with no relevant difference among treatments. Flushing and peripheral edema were seen in a dose-dependent fashion in the active treatment groups only. Conclusion: These data, the first, suggest the therapeutic benefit of selective endothelin(A) receptor antagonism in human hypertension. (C) 2002 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据